The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It's apparently true that this is a way 7-up is served in Hong Kong. However, I doubt there are sufficient sources discussing this practice in detail, and even if there are, it merits at most a section in
7 up, not its own article.
Sammy1339 (
talk) 07:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page which is a cleaned-up version of the one under discussion already:reply
Delete. What a mess. This of course is not a reason for deletion, but failing
WP:GNG badly is (existing references are to blogs and recipe/cooking sites). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 09:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: I'm not sure whether the topic is actually notable. I just wanted to point out that a better structured article about the same topic has been just published:
Salted lemon seven-up.
LowLevel73(talk) 19:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment No doubt exists, large number of mentions by Chinese names (like in restaurant reviews) but not sure if good enough to warrant individual article. Also not fully support merging to
7 Up because although being namesake, it would be just as valid using other similar brands of soda. Better merge under
Cha chaan teng as a menu item. PS. zhwp's corresponding coverage is a section under
zh:檸檬七喜 (Lemon 7 Up).
野狼院ひさしHisashiYarouin 05:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Deadbeef 06:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Tom Morris (
talk) 07:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It's apparently true that this is a way 7-up is served in Hong Kong. However, I doubt there are sufficient sources discussing this practice in detail, and even if there are, it merits at most a section in
7 up, not its own article.
Sammy1339 (
talk) 07:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page which is a cleaned-up version of the one under discussion already:reply
Delete. What a mess. This of course is not a reason for deletion, but failing
WP:GNG badly is (existing references are to blogs and recipe/cooking sites). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 09:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: I'm not sure whether the topic is actually notable. I just wanted to point out that a better structured article about the same topic has been just published:
Salted lemon seven-up.
LowLevel73(talk) 19:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment No doubt exists, large number of mentions by Chinese names (like in restaurant reviews) but not sure if good enough to warrant individual article. Also not fully support merging to
7 Up because although being namesake, it would be just as valid using other similar brands of soda. Better merge under
Cha chaan teng as a menu item. PS. zhwp's corresponding coverage is a section under
zh:檸檬七喜 (Lemon 7 Up).
野狼院ひさしHisashiYarouin 05:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Deadbeef 06:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Tom Morris (
talk) 07:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.