The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment I don't want to claim that I know everything, but I'm pretty sure that this article is notable based on our guidelines. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to work on it over the past two months, but that doesn't mean that independent sources do not exist. This page has place for improvement. To be more specific, searching the topic on Google brings up articles by famous Turkish newspapers Hürriyet, Milliyet, and Habertürk. So in my opinion, it can be improved, and there's no need to delete it. Keivan.fTalk04:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment on the comment An article needs to demonstrate notability. Just stating that there's scope for improving it isn't enough. Schwede6605:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I'm talking about the possible ways this article can be improved. But, of course, since I'm the only person here who can read in Turkish and happens to be the article's creator, it will be up to me to work on it, unless someone familiar with the language decides to help. Keivan.fTalk10:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Also, don't forget that this article has a big lack of sources, and does not demonstrate notability. I am unsure of whether Turkish newspapers such as the ones
Keivan.f mentioned are reliable sources. To better understand this, we need to analyse
WP:NEWSORG and see whether those are good ones to mention as references. If they are, this article could improve with more reliable sources. If they aren't, we need to find more reliable sources to look at. With thanks,
WikiSmartLife (
talk)
06:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I checked the references, one is the album's page on Sony Music Turkey, one is an online music shop, and the other is the album on Apple Music. This demonstrates a very big lack of reliable sources, like I have mentioned repeatedly, and we need major improvements on not only that but the article itself and its notability. Currently it is just a track listing with 3 sources, all associated with music and media.
WikiSmartLife (
talk)
06:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Let me make something clear. Just like The New York Times and The Washington Post, newspapers that publish works written by well-known writers could be used as references. That's why I didn't mention a Turkish tabloid or magazine to be used as a source of information for this article. Keivan.fTalk10:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Keivan.f: I was just saying that because the article has a lack of references. If those papers were notable enough to be used as references, they would have made good references.
WikiSmartLife (
talk)
11:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: It remains unclear if the Turkish sources are
reliable sources. Giving it another week to allow such a discussion to take place.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MrClog (
talk)
18:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment I don't want to claim that I know everything, but I'm pretty sure that this article is notable based on our guidelines. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to work on it over the past two months, but that doesn't mean that independent sources do not exist. This page has place for improvement. To be more specific, searching the topic on Google brings up articles by famous Turkish newspapers Hürriyet, Milliyet, and Habertürk. So in my opinion, it can be improved, and there's no need to delete it. Keivan.fTalk04:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment on the comment An article needs to demonstrate notability. Just stating that there's scope for improving it isn't enough. Schwede6605:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I'm talking about the possible ways this article can be improved. But, of course, since I'm the only person here who can read in Turkish and happens to be the article's creator, it will be up to me to work on it, unless someone familiar with the language decides to help. Keivan.fTalk10:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Also, don't forget that this article has a big lack of sources, and does not demonstrate notability. I am unsure of whether Turkish newspapers such as the ones
Keivan.f mentioned are reliable sources. To better understand this, we need to analyse
WP:NEWSORG and see whether those are good ones to mention as references. If they are, this article could improve with more reliable sources. If they aren't, we need to find more reliable sources to look at. With thanks,
WikiSmartLife (
talk)
06:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I checked the references, one is the album's page on Sony Music Turkey, one is an online music shop, and the other is the album on Apple Music. This demonstrates a very big lack of reliable sources, like I have mentioned repeatedly, and we need major improvements on not only that but the article itself and its notability. Currently it is just a track listing with 3 sources, all associated with music and media.
WikiSmartLife (
talk)
06:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Let me make something clear. Just like The New York Times and The Washington Post, newspapers that publish works written by well-known writers could be used as references. That's why I didn't mention a Turkish tabloid or magazine to be used as a source of information for this article. Keivan.fTalk10:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Keivan.f: I was just saying that because the article has a lack of references. If those papers were notable enough to be used as references, they would have made good references.
WikiSmartLife (
talk)
11:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: It remains unclear if the Turkish sources are
reliable sources. Giving it another week to allow such a discussion to take place.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MrClog (
talk)
18:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.