The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment So far nothing has been to effectively improve the references. Ref 1,5,10, 13 are non-rs. They are unreliable sources. Looking at the other references:
Comment The coverage of this individual has been moderate to say the least, but the presence he has made is quite large. I think the podcast links should be considered in the future as a form of historical archive, as many a time have they corrected mistakes that authors on this very platform have created. Also, there are numerous articles on this platform with fewer references and works to back up notoriety. Nevertheless, there is enough here to maintain the article's importance. Despite the user who continually removes the history of this individual, regardless of what they feel is important, there is plenty of sources remaining to maintain this page. --Metalworker14 (Yo) 21:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
The article references have been redone such that 1,5,10,13 are non-rs but they show passing mentions, for example
Hearst Digital. It is the same references before. For example
hollywood reporter, a passing mention. The form here is to produce three secondary sources per
WP:THREE that show the person is notable. scope_creepTalk10:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment So far nothing has been to effectively improve the references. Ref 1,5,10, 13 are non-rs. They are unreliable sources. Looking at the other references:
Comment The coverage of this individual has been moderate to say the least, but the presence he has made is quite large. I think the podcast links should be considered in the future as a form of historical archive, as many a time have they corrected mistakes that authors on this very platform have created. Also, there are numerous articles on this platform with fewer references and works to back up notoriety. Nevertheless, there is enough here to maintain the article's importance. Despite the user who continually removes the history of this individual, regardless of what they feel is important, there is plenty of sources remaining to maintain this page. --Metalworker14 (Yo) 21:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
The article references have been redone such that 1,5,10,13 are non-rs but they show passing mentions, for example
Hearst Digital. It is the same references before. For example
hollywood reporter, a passing mention. The form here is to produce three secondary sources per
WP:THREE that show the person is notable. scope_creepTalk10:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.