The result was keep. There is a consensus to Keep this article and that sources in the article and those that have been brought up are sufficient. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Her notability cannot be proven by independent and reliable sources. Only IFEX source is good, but it is not adequate for passing GNG. As a result of the research conducted on the person, it was not possible to find independent and reliable sources. Considering there are not enough resources, deletion is appropriate. Kadı Message 20:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a consensus to Keep this article and that sources in the article and those that have been brought up are sufficient. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Her notability cannot be proven by independent and reliable sources. Only IFEX source is good, but it is not adequate for passing GNG. As a result of the research conducted on the person, it was not possible to find independent and reliable sources. Considering there are not enough resources, deletion is appropriate. Kadı Message 20:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)