- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. czar 22:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Walpole, 8th Earl of Orford ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person doesn't exist. It's a fake. 'Earl of Orford' title became extinct in 1931. [1]( talk) GorgonaJS 21:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Morris, Susan, ed. (2019). Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage. p. 4699.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:22, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G3 as a hoax. Mccapra ( talk) 00:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Was incorrectly filed as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Walpole, 8th Earl of Orford (2nd nomination); nomination has been moved, but other links and the transcusion into the log has not been changed. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as hoax. The citations are fraudulent - none of the cited sources have the information they are supposedly documenting. Agricolae ( talk) 23:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - this is either a completely made up entry or a case of someone claiming a title they have no right to. Either way there should not be an article. Dunarc ( talk) 19:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. czar 22:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Walpole, 8th Earl of Orford ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person doesn't exist. It's a fake. 'Earl of Orford' title became extinct in 1931. [1]( talk) GorgonaJS 21:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Morris, Susan, ed. (2019). Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage. p. 4699.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:22, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G3 as a hoax. Mccapra ( talk) 00:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Was incorrectly filed as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Walpole, 8th Earl of Orford (2nd nomination); nomination has been moved, but other links and the transcusion into the log has not been changed. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as hoax. The citations are fraudulent - none of the cited sources have the information they are supposedly documenting. Agricolae ( talk) 23:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - this is either a completely made up entry or a case of someone claiming a title they have no right to. Either way there should not be an article. Dunarc ( talk) 19:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.