- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. After much-extended time for discussion, there is a low-participation consensus to delete the article. However, given the fact that the subject exists and has had non-trivial academic impact, I would be glad to refund this article to draft if any editor is interested in taking it up as a subject for improvement. BD2412 T 04:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Stefanotti ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PR, notability lacking, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Acousmana ( talk) 19:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Acousmana ( talk) 19:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:TNT. I just don't see significant coverage at all, and he does not pass WP:PROF, WP:CREATIVE, or WP:NAUTHOR. If he paid for this article, he should demand a refund. Bearian ( talk) 16:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 22:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
This article was nominated for a "keep" in the first iteration Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Stefanotti Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 16:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep per criteria 1 of WP:Creative. Two sources acknowledge his central importance in the photo-realism movement: the New Yorker (see article citation) and in Horizon - Volume 24, Issue 4 - Page 33 (offline). That in conjunction with the sources cited in the first AFD by User:James500 (see link to first AFD above) seem to meet the criteria for WP:GNG. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidal prophet 19:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Article reads more like a promotional blurb than anything else. TH1980 ( talk) 22:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Are any of these Google Scholar mentions relevant? https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=robert+stefanotti Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 12:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. After much-extended time for discussion, there is a low-participation consensus to delete the article. However, given the fact that the subject exists and has had non-trivial academic impact, I would be glad to refund this article to draft if any editor is interested in taking it up as a subject for improvement. BD2412 T 04:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Stefanotti ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PR, notability lacking, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Acousmana ( talk) 19:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Acousmana ( talk) 19:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:TNT. I just don't see significant coverage at all, and he does not pass WP:PROF, WP:CREATIVE, or WP:NAUTHOR. If he paid for this article, he should demand a refund. Bearian ( talk) 16:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 22:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
This article was nominated for a "keep" in the first iteration Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Stefanotti Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 16:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep per criteria 1 of WP:Creative. Two sources acknowledge his central importance in the photo-realism movement: the New Yorker (see article citation) and in Horizon - Volume 24, Issue 4 - Page 33 (offline). That in conjunction with the sources cited in the first AFD by User:James500 (see link to first AFD above) seem to meet the criteria for WP:GNG. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidal prophet 19:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Article reads more like a promotional blurb than anything else. TH1980 ( talk) 22:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Are any of these Google Scholar mentions relevant? https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=robert+stefanotti Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 12:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.