From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There's consensus here that the requirements of the relevant notability guidelines aren't met with sourcing. ~ mazca talk 14:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Richard Kent

Richard Kent (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Can't find much coverage outside of routine transactional news (hirings, firings, etc.) and this coach's highest position has been as a position coach in the CFL. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • comment I'm having a hard time differentiating all the possible candidates based on the noise in online searches. As the article is written, I'm going with delete but I wouldn't be opposed to additional sources or commentary if it were to be presented. "Userfy" would be an acceptable option if any editor is particularly enthusiastic about additional research and development.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 15:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • comment a non-notable football coach, but I don't see why he should be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexdlp10 ( talkcontribs) 09:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete non-notable football coach, possible COI as it's written a little bit close to the subject as well (college degrees). SportingFlyer T· C 19:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There's consensus here that the requirements of the relevant notability guidelines aren't met with sourcing. ~ mazca talk 14:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Richard Kent

Richard Kent (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Can't find much coverage outside of routine transactional news (hirings, firings, etc.) and this coach's highest position has been as a position coach in the CFL. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Eagles  24/7  (C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • comment I'm having a hard time differentiating all the possible candidates based on the noise in online searches. As the article is written, I'm going with delete but I wouldn't be opposed to additional sources or commentary if it were to be presented. "Userfy" would be an acceptable option if any editor is particularly enthusiastic about additional research and development.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 15:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • comment a non-notable football coach, but I don't see why he should be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexdlp10 ( talkcontribs) 09:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete non-notable football coach, possible COI as it's written a little bit close to the subject as well (college degrees). SportingFlyer T· C 19:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook