The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There's consensus here that the requirements of the relevant notability guidelines aren't met with sourcing. ~
mazcatalk 14:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NGRIDIRON. Can't find much coverage outside of routine transactional news (hirings, firings, etc.) and this coach's highest position has been as a position coach in the CFL. Eagles24/7(C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 07:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
comment I'm having a hard time differentiating all the possible candidates based on the noise in online searches. As the article is written, I'm going with delete but I wouldn't be opposed to additional sources or commentary if it were to be presented. "Userfy" would be an acceptable option if any editor is particularly enthusiastic about additional research and development.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 15:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
comment a non-notable football coach, but I don't see why he should be deleted — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Alexdlp10 (
talk •
contribs) 09:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable football coach, possible COI as it's written a little bit close to the subject as well (college degrees).
SportingFlyerT·C 19:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There's consensus here that the requirements of the relevant notability guidelines aren't met with sourcing. ~
mazcatalk 14:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NGRIDIRON. Can't find much coverage outside of routine transactional news (hirings, firings, etc.) and this coach's highest position has been as a position coach in the CFL. Eagles24/7(C) 19:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 07:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
comment I'm having a hard time differentiating all the possible candidates based on the noise in online searches. As the article is written, I'm going with delete but I wouldn't be opposed to additional sources or commentary if it were to be presented. "Userfy" would be an acceptable option if any editor is particularly enthusiastic about additional research and development.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 15:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
comment a non-notable football coach, but I don't see why he should be deleted — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Alexdlp10 (
talk •
contribs) 09:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable football coach, possible COI as it's written a little bit close to the subject as well (college degrees).
SportingFlyerT·C 19:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.