From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 07:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Progression of Saarland association football caps record

Progression of Saarland association football caps record (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns - doesn't appear to meet WP:LISTN. Only source is RSSSF. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 08:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
It shows, throughout history, who has held the record for most caps for Saarland at any given time. The challenge is to prove how this meets our notability criteria as I'm not aware of any significant coverage of this topic anywhere. Spiderone 16:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC) reply
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not generally seen as a great reason to keep an article; I plan to nominate the England article for deletion after this one concludes anyway Spiderone 21:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Yes. "When used correctly, these comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent in the content that it provides or excludes." Ludost Mlačani ( talk) 07:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Please can you explain how this article passes WP:LISTN or WP:GNG? For the record, I think the England one fails LISTN as well so your only argument for notability of this article is resting on other articles that also fail LISTN Spiderone 07:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
I am not saying it passes anything, I am saying we need a centralised debate as we clearly have a limited set of subjects, for which we need a general rule. Ludost Mlačani ( talk) 17:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately that's not way the English Wikipedia works. Because of the completely stupid WP:GNG concept, it's quite easy to end up deleting something like the current article while keeping something like Progression of England association football caps record. Nigej ( talk) 17:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
I will be nominating the England one after this discussion. It depends on the consensus established here. If this one gains a consensus of 'keep' then there would be absolutely no point in putting the England one up for AfD. Spiderone 18:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 07:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Progression of Saarland association football caps record

Progression of Saarland association football caps record (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns - doesn't appear to meet WP:LISTN. Only source is RSSSF. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 08:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
It shows, throughout history, who has held the record for most caps for Saarland at any given time. The challenge is to prove how this meets our notability criteria as I'm not aware of any significant coverage of this topic anywhere. Spiderone 16:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC) reply
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not generally seen as a great reason to keep an article; I plan to nominate the England article for deletion after this one concludes anyway Spiderone 21:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Yes. "When used correctly, these comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent in the content that it provides or excludes." Ludost Mlačani ( talk) 07:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Please can you explain how this article passes WP:LISTN or WP:GNG? For the record, I think the England one fails LISTN as well so your only argument for notability of this article is resting on other articles that also fail LISTN Spiderone 07:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
I am not saying it passes anything, I am saying we need a centralised debate as we clearly have a limited set of subjects, for which we need a general rule. Ludost Mlačani ( talk) 17:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately that's not way the English Wikipedia works. Because of the completely stupid WP:GNG concept, it's quite easy to end up deleting something like the current article while keeping something like Progression of England association football caps record. Nigej ( talk) 17:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
I will be nominating the England one after this discussion. It depends on the consensus established here. If this one gains a consensus of 'keep' then there would be absolutely no point in putting the England one up for AfD. Spiderone 18:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook