The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment The Snopes page
[1] probably counts towards something, there's also a number of book hits.
[2][3][4] I'm leaning towards this being a notable hoax.
Artw (
talk)
15:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Additional reliable sources can be found at
[8] and
[9]. Between us we have disproved the nominator's claim that no reliable sources cover this hoax. There are plenty.
Phil Bridger (
talk)
16:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment The Snopes page
[1] probably counts towards something, there's also a number of book hits.
[2][3][4] I'm leaning towards this being a notable hoax.
Artw (
talk)
15:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Additional reliable sources can be found at
[8] and
[9]. Between us we have disproved the nominator's claim that no reliable sources cover this hoax. There are plenty.
Phil Bridger (
talk)
16:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.