From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Pressian

Pressian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company/website that seems to fail GNG/ WP:NCOMPANY/ WP:MEDIA. Contested prod, undeleted, so here we go. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Results on Naver seem to revolve solely around a controversy involving the site reporting sexual misconduct by politician Chung Bong-ju: [1], and I'm seeing the same thing on Google, with a few exceptions that consist only of name mentions, such as [2], [3], and [4]. GWU's research guide lists it, but only says it's an alternative SK news source. It seems to be treated as an established news outlet by other media sources, but without anything meeting WP:CORPDEPTH, there isn't much to base an article on. I'd suggest a merge to Media of South Korea#Internet journalism, but further expansion of that section would be necessary for inclusion of Pressian to make sense, and there isn't currently any real content to merge anyway. Skeletor3000 ( talk) 23:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Pressian

Pressian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company/website that seems to fail GNG/ WP:NCOMPANY/ WP:MEDIA. Contested prod, undeleted, so here we go. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Results on Naver seem to revolve solely around a controversy involving the site reporting sexual misconduct by politician Chung Bong-ju: [1], and I'm seeing the same thing on Google, with a few exceptions that consist only of name mentions, such as [2], [3], and [4]. GWU's research guide lists it, but only says it's an alternative SK news source. It seems to be treated as an established news outlet by other media sources, but without anything meeting WP:CORPDEPTH, there isn't much to base an article on. I'd suggest a merge to Media of South Korea#Internet journalism, but further expansion of that section would be necessary for inclusion of Pressian to make sense, and there isn't currently any real content to merge anyway. Skeletor3000 ( talk) 23:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook