From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. This No consensus closure doesn't mean that this article can't be turned into a Redirect, it just won't be as a result of this AFD. Please discuss this possibility on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Polesie, Pomeranian Voivodeship (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mass-created article by bot Kotbot operated by retired user Kotniski. There is nothing at the location in the article. The nearest building is the forestry office for Boroszewo, the address of which is given in Wędkowy.

This is an osada, or settlement, not a village or hamlet. It is a status often given to individual buildings, but in this case it is not clear that anyone has ever lived at the location indicated in our article.

In terms of ATDs redirecting to Tczew or another larger settlement only makes sense if you think we should redirect simple place-names to articles that won't contain any content about them. I don't think that makes sense.

Fails WP:GEOLAND, WP:GNG, WP:NOPAGE FOARP ( talk) 08:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk) 23:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please do not wait for User:Stok to make your opinion final.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. This No consensus closure doesn't mean that this article can't be turned into a Redirect, it just won't be as a result of this AFD. Please discuss this possibility on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Polesie, Pomeranian Voivodeship (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mass-created article by bot Kotbot operated by retired user Kotniski. There is nothing at the location in the article. The nearest building is the forestry office for Boroszewo, the address of which is given in Wędkowy.

This is an osada, or settlement, not a village or hamlet. It is a status often given to individual buildings, but in this case it is not clear that anyone has ever lived at the location indicated in our article.

In terms of ATDs redirecting to Tczew or another larger settlement only makes sense if you think we should redirect simple place-names to articles that won't contain any content about them. I don't think that makes sense.

Fails WP:GEOLAND, WP:GNG, WP:NOPAGE FOARP ( talk) 08:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk) 23:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please do not wait for User:Stok to make your opinion final.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook