From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination effectively withdrawn as the nominator now believes that WP:NBAND is passed with the evidence from the FA version on Russian wikipedia. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Pipes and Pints

Pipes and Pints (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Article not written from WP:NPOV and appears to contain some WP:OR, the removal of which would leave little remaining content for an overall non-notable band SamCordes Talk 04:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SamCordes Talk 04:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. SamCordes Talk 04:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - while this article is indeed a complete affront to NPOV and encyclopedic writing, the fact that there is a FA on ru.wiki caught my attention. Enough of the sources cited there seem to be decent, especially the ones from musicserver.cz. I would say the subject does pass GNG, but wouldn't be opposed to the article in its current form being blown up or stubbed. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination effectively withdrawn as the nominator now believes that WP:NBAND is passed with the evidence from the FA version on Russian wikipedia. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Pipes and Pints

Pipes and Pints (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Article not written from WP:NPOV and appears to contain some WP:OR, the removal of which would leave little remaining content for an overall non-notable band SamCordes Talk 04:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SamCordes Talk 04:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. SamCordes Talk 04:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - while this article is indeed a complete affront to NPOV and encyclopedic writing, the fact that there is a FA on ru.wiki caught my attention. Enough of the sources cited there seem to be decent, especially the ones from musicserver.cz. I would say the subject does pass GNG, but wouldn't be opposed to the article in its current form being blown up or stubbed. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook