The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 17:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Davewild (
talk) 09:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Davewild (
talk) 18:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as no evidence of notability, 1st and 3rd links are simply someones opinion, 2nd link is a blog so thus not a
WP:Reliable source, I can't find anything on Google so have to say Delete per GNG. –
Davey2010Talk 00:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The first
http://www.philstar.com article listed above only offers one paragraph on the subject while the second only mentions her briefly.
http://starforallseasons.com/television/ only mentions the subject twice: it's not related to her. We need significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Granted, I did find some material on the subject online, but nothing to satisfy
WP:GNG. However, sources do not have to be online, or even in English. If an editor can find books, publications (probably many in the 1960s) or similar content that discuss the subject I would be open to reviewing the additional content and changing my mind. Ping me if that happens.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 07:15, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 17:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Davewild (
talk) 09:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Davewild (
talk) 18:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as no evidence of notability, 1st and 3rd links are simply someones opinion, 2nd link is a blog so thus not a
WP:Reliable source, I can't find anything on Google so have to say Delete per GNG. –
Davey2010Talk 00:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The first
http://www.philstar.com article listed above only offers one paragraph on the subject while the second only mentions her briefly.
http://starforallseasons.com/television/ only mentions the subject twice: it's not related to her. We need significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Granted, I did find some material on the subject online, but nothing to satisfy
WP:GNG. However, sources do not have to be online, or even in English. If an editor can find books, publications (probably many in the 1960s) or similar content that discuss the subject I would be open to reviewing the additional content and changing my mind. Ping me if that happens.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 07:15, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.