The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Additional sourcing were insufficient to carry the argument, and the MTG criteria don't override the GNG. --
Euryalus (
talk) 11:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Cheon meets the GNG. There is coverage of him out there, it's just not in the article right now. I have added a source to the article independent of the wizards site, and could add more if needed.
Tazerdadog (
talk) 00:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Additionally, Cheon's 11-5 finish at PT Eldrich moon today is good for 10 additional pro points, which raises his career total to above 200, meeting the subject-specific notability guideline
hereTazerdadog (
talk) 10:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
His "finishes" are utterly beside the point. That "guideline" is not Wikipedia notability policy. Delete per nom.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 12:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 16:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last relist to assess whether the new sources provided by Tazerdadog satisfy notability.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 08:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 08:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, per the other MTG afds such as
Marcio Carvalho, note
WP:LOCALCONCENSUS, users can't decide that their SNG overrides
WP:GNG. The only source that seems to cover pro MTG is Channel Fireball, but I'm not even sure if that is reliable.--
Prisencolin (
talk) 03:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Additional sourcing were insufficient to carry the argument, and the MTG criteria don't override the GNG. --
Euryalus (
talk) 11:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Cheon meets the GNG. There is coverage of him out there, it's just not in the article right now. I have added a source to the article independent of the wizards site, and could add more if needed.
Tazerdadog (
talk) 00:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Additionally, Cheon's 11-5 finish at PT Eldrich moon today is good for 10 additional pro points, which raises his career total to above 200, meeting the subject-specific notability guideline
hereTazerdadog (
talk) 10:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
His "finishes" are utterly beside the point. That "guideline" is not Wikipedia notability policy. Delete per nom.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 12:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 16:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last relist to assess whether the new sources provided by Tazerdadog satisfy notability.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 08:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 08:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, per the other MTG afds such as
Marcio Carvalho, note
WP:LOCALCONCENSUS, users can't decide that their SNG overrides
WP:GNG. The only source that seems to cover pro MTG is Channel Fireball, but I'm not even sure if that is reliable.--
Prisencolin (
talk) 03:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.