The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 03:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Non-notable musician/singer. I can't find sourcing and being nominated for an ward with dubious notability doesn't help, not meeting GNG or MUSIC
Oaktree b (
talk) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
KEEP - Meets WP:MUSICBIO since he has award nomination in his own country, which also means he probably had radio airplay and chart ranking songs.
Pershkoviski (
talk) 02:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. The subject fails
WP:GNG and has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. The one song and extended play he has released has not been discussed in reliable sources. He has received multiple nominations for an award whose notability is questionable.
Versace1608Wanna Talk? 16:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 01:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No commentary since last relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk) 14:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. If the award nominations are notable, their should be SIGCOV about the subject surrounding their nomination, but I see none, just routine annoucements in entertaimnet news. Ping me if someone adds new SIGCOV refs to the article.
WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (
WP:V and
WP:BLP) and guidelines (
WP:BIO and
WP:IS,
WP:RS,
WP:SIGCOV). //
Timothy ::
talk 00:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 03:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Non-notable musician/singer. I can't find sourcing and being nominated for an ward with dubious notability doesn't help, not meeting GNG or MUSIC
Oaktree b (
talk) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)reply
KEEP - Meets WP:MUSICBIO since he has award nomination in his own country, which also means he probably had radio airplay and chart ranking songs.
Pershkoviski (
talk) 02:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. The subject fails
WP:GNG and has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. The one song and extended play he has released has not been discussed in reliable sources. He has received multiple nominations for an award whose notability is questionable.
Versace1608Wanna Talk? 16:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 01:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No commentary since last relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk) 14:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. If the award nominations are notable, their should be SIGCOV about the subject surrounding their nomination, but I see none, just routine annoucements in entertaimnet news. Ping me if someone adds new SIGCOV refs to the article.
WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (
WP:V and
WP:BLP) and guidelines (
WP:BIO and
WP:IS,
WP:RS,
WP:SIGCOV). //
Timothy ::
talk 00:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.