The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
In a similar manner to the deleted
Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons), this article fails
WP:GNG and lacks notability, despite the notability of the original creature in question. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 03:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete (SOFTDELETE) by redirecting to main article about Orcs. Orcs are orcs, and DnD orcs don't need a separate article, which is really plot summary and fancruft variations between editions/settings. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 05:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Totally agree with the other person. There's nothing special about DnD Orcs that warrants their own article. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 07:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Orc. There is a section in that article about their role in gaming, which can be expanded.
BD2412T 04:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - The article fails to establish notability. I'm not really sure what content would be worth merging. The article already has a sentence about D&D, so adding any more would be unneeded and give D&D too much weight despite not having notable Orcs.
TTN (
talk) 12:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
In a similar manner to the deleted
Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons), this article fails
WP:GNG and lacks notability, despite the notability of the original creature in question. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 03:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete (SOFTDELETE) by redirecting to main article about Orcs. Orcs are orcs, and DnD orcs don't need a separate article, which is really plot summary and fancruft variations between editions/settings. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 05:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Totally agree with the other person. There's nothing special about DnD Orcs that warrants their own article. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 07:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Orc. There is a section in that article about their role in gaming, which can be expanded.
BD2412T 04:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - The article fails to establish notability. I'm not really sure what content would be worth merging. The article already has a sentence about D&D, so adding any more would be unneeded and give D&D too much weight despite not having notable Orcs.
TTN (
talk) 12:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.