From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Australia (continent). RL0919 ( talk) 13:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Oceania (continent)

Oceania (continent) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a content fork of Australia (continent). All content easily covered there or at Oceania. BilCat ( talk) 01:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba ( talk) 02:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba ( talk) 02:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: I can see how the continent of Oceania could be discussed in either the region of Oceania or in the continent of Australia; but since there was controversy of where Oceania (continent) should point to, and the subject is notable (albeit marginally so -- almost a fringe theory), I thought a stand-alone article could settle the issue. fgnievinski ( talk) 03:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Merge into Oceania. While fgnievinski is right that the article doesn't currently directly mention the classification of Oceania as a continent, such content could easily be covered in Oceania, and readers would be better served by one comprehensive article about the term than by two articles that are about largely overlapping topics. I'm not sure I see the controversy regarding where Oceania (continent) should point to––if the content is merged to Oceania then it makes perfect sense to point it there. signed, Rosguill talk 06:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
The major issue here is Oceania isn't a continent. It's sometimes mistakenly referred to as a continent. You either have it redirect to the actual continent in the region (Australia) or redirect to the region itself (Oceania.) I guess you could make an argument it's a human geography term. Fortunately the redirect isn't linked to by any pages. SportingFlyer T· C 06:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
IMO the answer to this issue is what I've already suggested: redirect to the article about the region, and include a section addressing the fringe theory and/or misconception about the region being a continent proper. signed, Rosguill talk 06:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
It's an evolving cultural construct. Fifty years ago there was a firm conceptualization of Oceania as a continent. Later it eroded, in favor of Australia as continent. This is so at least in the anglosphere, not so much in other languages and cultures, as a quick glance at es:Oceanía or fr:Océanie can attest. So it's not a matter of right or wrong, it's just that Wikipedia shouldn't swipe under the rug that Oceania has been considered a continent. fgnievinski ( talk) 15:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. fgnievinski ( talk) 20:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Australia (continent). RL0919 ( talk) 13:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Oceania (continent)

Oceania (continent) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a content fork of Australia (continent). All content easily covered there or at Oceania. BilCat ( talk) 01:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba ( talk) 02:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba ( talk) 02:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: I can see how the continent of Oceania could be discussed in either the region of Oceania or in the continent of Australia; but since there was controversy of where Oceania (continent) should point to, and the subject is notable (albeit marginally so -- almost a fringe theory), I thought a stand-alone article could settle the issue. fgnievinski ( talk) 03:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Merge into Oceania. While fgnievinski is right that the article doesn't currently directly mention the classification of Oceania as a continent, such content could easily be covered in Oceania, and readers would be better served by one comprehensive article about the term than by two articles that are about largely overlapping topics. I'm not sure I see the controversy regarding where Oceania (continent) should point to––if the content is merged to Oceania then it makes perfect sense to point it there. signed, Rosguill talk 06:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
The major issue here is Oceania isn't a continent. It's sometimes mistakenly referred to as a continent. You either have it redirect to the actual continent in the region (Australia) or redirect to the region itself (Oceania.) I guess you could make an argument it's a human geography term. Fortunately the redirect isn't linked to by any pages. SportingFlyer T· C 06:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
IMO the answer to this issue is what I've already suggested: redirect to the article about the region, and include a section addressing the fringe theory and/or misconception about the region being a continent proper. signed, Rosguill talk 06:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
It's an evolving cultural construct. Fifty years ago there was a firm conceptualization of Oceania as a continent. Later it eroded, in favor of Australia as continent. This is so at least in the anglosphere, not so much in other languages and cultures, as a quick glance at es:Oceanía or fr:Océanie can attest. So it's not a matter of right or wrong, it's just that Wikipedia shouldn't swipe under the rug that Oceania has been considered a continent. fgnievinski ( talk) 15:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. fgnievinski ( talk) 20:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook