The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No significant coverage identified in reliable sources. To merge to
Nakagin Capsule Tower as suggested would give
WP:UNDUE weight, as there is no indication of the size of this individual's role: who knows how large the "senior management" was? Even to be useful as a redirect, there would need to be some evidence that this person is significant. —
swpbT17:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect or merge and keep the bluelink. This person played a role in the Tower, so it may well be a search term. If a merge would place too much importance on what we can't source, then a redirect would preserve the article history and allow it to be spun out if someone wants to improve it later.
Montanabw(talk)22:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete And please do not redirect or merge. There is not one reliable secondary source which proves that the subject is even linked to the
Nakagin Capsule Tower. This is a failure of
WP:V (forget notability) and we do not redirect if we cannot even verify. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
15:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
There is no indication that the subject played a role in the building of the tower. We have a source
[1] indicating that he was interviewed for this documentary. That is not equal to playing a major role in building the tower. In fact, I found this
trailer of the documentary with a reasonably detailed summary and it doesn't mention the subject at all. So I don't see why we should keep a redirect. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
04:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - I tried to find sources in Japanese, but whoever wrote this article seems to have put his name in backwards. I fixed it, but nothing I could find appeared to have anything to do with this particular Nobuo Abe. There is no Japanese WP article on him, he's not getting hits on the Japanese Nakagin article, he's not mentioned in any English article on the tower or the firm, and I'm going to also point out that he was ~31 years old when this project started, and thus highly unlikely to be considered for senior management at that age in a Japanese firm. I think someone is embellishing here, and without sources, there's nothing asserting notability. Also, just as an FYI, the editor who created this was blocked for copyvio.
MSJapan (
talk)
05:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No significant coverage identified in reliable sources. To merge to
Nakagin Capsule Tower as suggested would give
WP:UNDUE weight, as there is no indication of the size of this individual's role: who knows how large the "senior management" was? Even to be useful as a redirect, there would need to be some evidence that this person is significant. —
swpbT17:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect or merge and keep the bluelink. This person played a role in the Tower, so it may well be a search term. If a merge would place too much importance on what we can't source, then a redirect would preserve the article history and allow it to be spun out if someone wants to improve it later.
Montanabw(talk)22:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete And please do not redirect or merge. There is not one reliable secondary source which proves that the subject is even linked to the
Nakagin Capsule Tower. This is a failure of
WP:V (forget notability) and we do not redirect if we cannot even verify. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
15:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
There is no indication that the subject played a role in the building of the tower. We have a source
[1] indicating that he was interviewed for this documentary. That is not equal to playing a major role in building the tower. In fact, I found this
trailer of the documentary with a reasonably detailed summary and it doesn't mention the subject at all. So I don't see why we should keep a redirect. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
04:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - I tried to find sources in Japanese, but whoever wrote this article seems to have put his name in backwards. I fixed it, but nothing I could find appeared to have anything to do with this particular Nobuo Abe. There is no Japanese WP article on him, he's not getting hits on the Japanese Nakagin article, he's not mentioned in any English article on the tower or the firm, and I'm going to also point out that he was ~31 years old when this project started, and thus highly unlikely to be considered for senior management at that age in a Japanese firm. I think someone is embellishing here, and without sources, there's nothing asserting notability. Also, just as an FYI, the editor who created this was blocked for copyvio.
MSJapan (
talk)
05:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.