The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator.
✗plicit 14:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Apparent hoax, or at least misinterpretation of the sources. "Nlaza" is not a person; when records indicate that someone was the son of Nlaza, this meant membership to a specific social order. See p. 110 of
this article. I can find no other attestation to this Nlaza existing.
Urve (
talk) 05:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn.
Urve (
talk) 07:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 07:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Withdraw - It was surprisingly difficult, but I finally found some attestation for someone proximal to the dynasty named Nlaza. The fact that Nlaza is at once not a name according to Kongo royal scholars and it also is... they need to sort something out. Anyway, withdraw per this source. Thornton, John K. (November 2006). "Elite women in the kingdom of Kongo: Historical perspectives on women's political power". The Journal of African History. 47 (3): 437–460.
doi:
10.1017/S0021853706001812.
Urve (
talk) 07:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator.
✗plicit 14:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Apparent hoax, or at least misinterpretation of the sources. "Nlaza" is not a person; when records indicate that someone was the son of Nlaza, this meant membership to a specific social order. See p. 110 of
this article. I can find no other attestation to this Nlaza existing.
Urve (
talk) 05:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn.
Urve (
talk) 07:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 07:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Withdraw - It was surprisingly difficult, but I finally found some attestation for someone proximal to the dynasty named Nlaza. The fact that Nlaza is at once not a name according to Kongo royal scholars and it also is... they need to sort something out. Anyway, withdraw per this source. Thornton, John K. (November 2006). "Elite women in the kingdom of Kongo: Historical perspectives on women's political power". The Journal of African History. 47 (3): 437–460.
doi:
10.1017/S0021853706001812.
Urve (
talk) 07:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.