The result was delete. The consensus is that this subject fails to meet the criteria for inclusion. PhantomSteve/ talk¦ contribs\ 17:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No reliable sources (none in English, as well), does not seem to be notable. EpicPupper 21:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
coordinates are for an isolated house- no. it is a group of buildings. In plwiki Nawojczyn is described as osada, which is a minor settlement. Lembit Staan ( talk) 21:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
This guideline specifically excludes maps and tables from consideration when establishing topic notability, because these sources often establish little except the existence of the subject. plwiki has different rules (which is OK). On the other hand,
Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable- here we have a problem. How do we know if it is populated and legally recognized? It was already discussed that postal index is not an evidence neither of being populated not officially recognized, just the same as children of illegal immigrants can go to school her in California, but merely having student's card does not make them legal. Finally the wording "typically presumed to be" which is not the same as "are notable". "Presumed" means "if wikipedians were not so lazy, they would have found WP:GNG sources to establish notability". I say, not in his case. IMO the only one thing notable about it is its name :-) (and I expanded the article accordingly) Lembit Staan ( talk) 19:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. The consensus is that this subject fails to meet the criteria for inclusion. PhantomSteve/ talk¦ contribs\ 17:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No reliable sources (none in English, as well), does not seem to be notable. EpicPupper 21:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
coordinates are for an isolated house- no. it is a group of buildings. In plwiki Nawojczyn is described as osada, which is a minor settlement. Lembit Staan ( talk) 21:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
This guideline specifically excludes maps and tables from consideration when establishing topic notability, because these sources often establish little except the existence of the subject. plwiki has different rules (which is OK). On the other hand,
Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable- here we have a problem. How do we know if it is populated and legally recognized? It was already discussed that postal index is not an evidence neither of being populated not officially recognized, just the same as children of illegal immigrants can go to school her in California, but merely having student's card does not make them legal. Finally the wording "typically presumed to be" which is not the same as "are notable". "Presumed" means "if wikipedians were not so lazy, they would have found WP:GNG sources to establish notability". I say, not in his case. IMO the only one thing notable about it is its name :-) (and I expanded the article accordingly) Lembit Staan ( talk) 19:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)