The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:BIO. UPE. Coverage is mainly interviews, or his commentary, which isn't significant or indepth. WP:BEFORE finds nothing of significance. Forbes coverage is either 404 or contributors. No secondary coverage scope_creep Talk 00:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep The sources appear to convey notability. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JRed176 (
talk •
contribs) 19:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk)
00:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Well, what a sorry list. Of 13 refs 4 are press-release. 3 are non-RS, 1 passing mention, 1 primary, 1 is interview, 1 routine job annoucement and 1 interview. There is not a single WP:SECONDARY on the subject. Certainly verifies he exists. A WP:BEFORE found the exact same. Completely fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 11:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
So not a single secondary source, as SPA coi editor has to come and shovel more junk in support this BLP. No significant coverage, even on the BEFORE has been found. Fails WP:SICOV, WP:BIO. What is there is x of y articles, business profiles, interview and PR. No secondary coverage. scope_creep Talk 09:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need more participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:BIO. UPE. Coverage is mainly interviews, or his commentary, which isn't significant or indepth. WP:BEFORE finds nothing of significance. Forbes coverage is either 404 or contributors. No secondary coverage scope_creep Talk 00:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep The sources appear to convey notability. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JRed176 (
talk •
contribs) 19:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk)
00:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Well, what a sorry list. Of 13 refs 4 are press-release. 3 are non-RS, 1 passing mention, 1 primary, 1 is interview, 1 routine job annoucement and 1 interview. There is not a single WP:SECONDARY on the subject. Certainly verifies he exists. A WP:BEFORE found the exact same. Completely fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 11:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
So not a single secondary source, as SPA coi editor has to come and shovel more junk in support this BLP. No significant coverage, even on the BEFORE has been found. Fails WP:SICOV, WP:BIO. What is there is x of y articles, business profiles, interview and PR. No secondary coverage. scope_creep Talk 09:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need more participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)