From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 06:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Nate Bloom

Nate Bloom (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability? Anmccaff ( talk) 06:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep over 300 linked wiki articles use this author as a source as well as major publications like the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post. I can look for more if needed. There are numerous books that use him as a source as well. Patapsco913 ( talk) 07:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 07:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - does not meet WP:NAUTHOR criteria. Of course the subject has articles - he is a columnist. That does not make him notable.-- Rpclod ( talk) 14:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - the editor objecting to deletion, User:Patapsco913, created this article on 23 December, today added a huge number of Nate Bloom WP:LINKSPAM to Wikipedia articles, in most cases adding it as gratuitous WP:OVERCITING to articles that already had proper RS cites to support Jewish heritage. This strikes me as highly suspicious evidence that this is a WP:COI editor, and his comments should be taken in that perspective. And given the dozens of such cites today alone, I would also take his "300 wiki articles" statement in that perspective. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
He is a good source. I really don't care if this article is deleted. I just though that people should be able to refer to someone who is being used throughout wikipedia. Many of the citations are either archived, questionable reliability, or unlinked. Patapsco913 ( talk) 18:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
anyhow the edits I added were:

Patapsco913 ( talk) 19:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. He appears to be just another specialty-newspaper columnist. All the sources we have are either by him or quoting him, not providing the in-depth coverage about him needed for WP:GNG. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 06:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Nate Bloom

Nate Bloom (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability? Anmccaff ( talk) 06:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep over 300 linked wiki articles use this author as a source as well as major publications like the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post. I can look for more if needed. There are numerous books that use him as a source as well. Patapsco913 ( talk) 07:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 07:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - does not meet WP:NAUTHOR criteria. Of course the subject has articles - he is a columnist. That does not make him notable.-- Rpclod ( talk) 14:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - the editor objecting to deletion, User:Patapsco913, created this article on 23 December, today added a huge number of Nate Bloom WP:LINKSPAM to Wikipedia articles, in most cases adding it as gratuitous WP:OVERCITING to articles that already had proper RS cites to support Jewish heritage. This strikes me as highly suspicious evidence that this is a WP:COI editor, and his comments should be taken in that perspective. And given the dozens of such cites today alone, I would also take his "300 wiki articles" statement in that perspective. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
He is a good source. I really don't care if this article is deleted. I just though that people should be able to refer to someone who is being used throughout wikipedia. Many of the citations are either archived, questionable reliability, or unlinked. Patapsco913 ( talk) 18:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
anyhow the edits I added were:

Patapsco913 ( talk) 19:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. He appears to be just another specialty-newspaper columnist. All the sources we have are either by him or quoting him, not providing the in-depth coverage about him needed for WP:GNG. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook