- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Muttpop ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could not find any sources about this toy company. Not really sure if its even still active at this point. GamerPro64 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Companies. GamerPro64 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur that what we have is not good enough for mainspace; fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG, also WP:V Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Muttpop ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could not find any sources about this toy company. Not really sure if its even still active at this point. GamerPro64 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Companies. GamerPro64 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur that what we have is not good enough for mainspace; fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG, also WP:V Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.