The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable college athlete, some minor coverage in newspapers but it's all local to where he played along with some prep coverage, fails
WP:GRIDIRON,
WP:NCOLLATH.
SportingFlyerT·C 18:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. He was on track to stardom during his early career (see stats
here) but multiple injuries cut short his career.The short career makes it a closer call but I'm still finding enough SIGCOV to push him over the GNG bar. There's a ton of SIGCOV in the Fort Collins newspaper. E.g.
part 1/
part 2,
part 1/
part 2, and
this. Also finding some SIGCOV from outside Fort Collins. E.g.,
this,
this, and
this.
Cbl62 (
talk) 23:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)reply
He did nothing of note.
WP:NCOLLATH requires national coverage to guarantee notability. The Loveland newspaper is the one down the road from Fort Collins. The Denver story is routine and transactional. I'm not sure about Orlando, but he's from Kissimmee. This is exceptionally
WP:ROUTINE.
SportingFlyerT·C 23:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)reply
NCOLLATH is an inclusionary standard, not an exclusionary one. No one argues that he passes NCOLLATH. The issue is GNG, and he clearly passes that standard with SIGCOV in multiple (at least four), reliable, and independent sources. There are multiple articles on Momo in the Denver press -- here's
another.
Cbl62 (
talk) 00:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Here is yet another feature story on Momo that is not from Fort Collins or Colorado. Maybe you would consider just withdrawing this one?
Cbl62 (
talk) 00:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)reply
I also disagree strongly with your reliance on
WP:ROUTINE. The sources presented include features stories focused exclusively on Momo. Such coverage is the antithesis of WP:ROUTINE.
Cbl62 (
talk) 00:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 22:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets GNG based on sources found by Cbl62.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 22:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable college athlete, some minor coverage in newspapers but it's all local to where he played along with some prep coverage, fails
WP:GRIDIRON,
WP:NCOLLATH.
SportingFlyerT·C 18:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. He was on track to stardom during his early career (see stats
here) but multiple injuries cut short his career.The short career makes it a closer call but I'm still finding enough SIGCOV to push him over the GNG bar. There's a ton of SIGCOV in the Fort Collins newspaper. E.g.
part 1/
part 2,
part 1/
part 2, and
this. Also finding some SIGCOV from outside Fort Collins. E.g.,
this,
this, and
this.
Cbl62 (
talk) 23:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)reply
He did nothing of note.
WP:NCOLLATH requires national coverage to guarantee notability. The Loveland newspaper is the one down the road from Fort Collins. The Denver story is routine and transactional. I'm not sure about Orlando, but he's from Kissimmee. This is exceptionally
WP:ROUTINE.
SportingFlyerT·C 23:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)reply
NCOLLATH is an inclusionary standard, not an exclusionary one. No one argues that he passes NCOLLATH. The issue is GNG, and he clearly passes that standard with SIGCOV in multiple (at least four), reliable, and independent sources. There are multiple articles on Momo in the Denver press -- here's
another.
Cbl62 (
talk) 00:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Here is yet another feature story on Momo that is not from Fort Collins or Colorado. Maybe you would consider just withdrawing this one?
Cbl62 (
talk) 00:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)reply
I also disagree strongly with your reliance on
WP:ROUTINE. The sources presented include features stories focused exclusively on Momo. Such coverage is the antithesis of WP:ROUTINE.
Cbl62 (
talk) 00:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 22:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets GNG based on sources found by Cbl62.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 22:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.