The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No independent refs in the article. Googling reveals lots of hits, primarily sites associated with the subject; secondarily there are a number of blogs and other non-reliable sources, but no WP:RS's.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
18:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep I contested the PROD because the lists of published books seemed extensive, if not notable, and deserved a closer look via AfD. I was neutral at the time, having not really looked that deeply into the man. After doing some searching, Google News pops up an article on one of his books (full disclosure: he writes a column for the same publication)
[1]. There also seem to be several articles in relation to his activities surrounding LGBTQ groups in the
Charlotte, NC area see
[2],
[3],
[4]. He seems to scrape by
WP:GNG, which is why I am !voting weak keep.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
20:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep There appear to be several articles about his involvement in and departure from the
Brownsville Revival; see Talk page. His 2010 commentary on Jeremiah in The Expositor's Bible Commentary series is a significant contribution that should have some assessment in academic sources. Because of his prominence in Messianic Judaism there should be some rabbinic reaction. SBaker43 (
talk)
01:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No independent refs in the article. Googling reveals lots of hits, primarily sites associated with the subject; secondarily there are a number of blogs and other non-reliable sources, but no WP:RS's.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
18:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep I contested the PROD because the lists of published books seemed extensive, if not notable, and deserved a closer look via AfD. I was neutral at the time, having not really looked that deeply into the man. After doing some searching, Google News pops up an article on one of his books (full disclosure: he writes a column for the same publication)
[1]. There also seem to be several articles in relation to his activities surrounding LGBTQ groups in the
Charlotte, NC area see
[2],
[3],
[4]. He seems to scrape by
WP:GNG, which is why I am !voting weak keep.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
20:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep There appear to be several articles about his involvement in and departure from the
Brownsville Revival; see Talk page. His 2010 commentary on Jeremiah in The Expositor's Bible Commentary series is a significant contribution that should have some assessment in academic sources. Because of his prominence in Messianic Judaism there should be some rabbinic reaction. SBaker43 (
talk)
01:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.