The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note. This is a foundational copyvio by paid editor
Trident13. It's without footnotes, and appallingly badly written: "Born in Foord Road in Folkestone, Kent, Hogben's mother died ..." - why should we care where his mother was born? I don't think there's much doubt that the topic is notable.
WP:TNT seems the best way forward, or else a rewrite from scratch at
Talk:Michael Hogben/Temp, if anyone feels like it.
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
19:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Delete - The general interest articles do not qualify as "secondary sources" and do not themselves support "notability". Further the referenced articles are not integrated into the Wikipedia article but are just listed under references. Is this the work of a publicist?--
Rpclod (
talk)
03:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note. This is a foundational copyvio by paid editor
Trident13. It's without footnotes, and appallingly badly written: "Born in Foord Road in Folkestone, Kent, Hogben's mother died ..." - why should we care where his mother was born? I don't think there's much doubt that the topic is notable.
WP:TNT seems the best way forward, or else a rewrite from scratch at
Talk:Michael Hogben/Temp, if anyone feels like it.
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
19:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Delete - The general interest articles do not qualify as "secondary sources" and do not themselves support "notability". Further the referenced articles are not integrated into the Wikipedia article but are just listed under references. Is this the work of a publicist?--
Rpclod (
talk)
03:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.