- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Medrar for contemporary art
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Medrar for contemporary art ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm genuinely not sure how the previous AFD was not closed as "delete" given there was no opposition to the nomination. I also see that nothing has changed since then; there are barely any sources in the text, there is nothing in the search engines to indicate it is any more notable than it was six years ago, and less than ten edits to improve it since the last discussion. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Delete coverage I see is limited to event listings and one about its move, nothing to meet WP:ORG. Any Arabic speakers willing to chime in to see if there's adequate non-English sourcing? And concur, that last one should have been treated as a PROD. Star Mississippi 12:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Delete per Star Mississippi and nom. 4meter4 ( talk) 00:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 04:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - this is promotional piece rather than an encyclopedia article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Medrar for contemporary art
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Medrar for contemporary art ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm genuinely not sure how the previous AFD was not closed as "delete" given there was no opposition to the nomination. I also see that nothing has changed since then; there are barely any sources in the text, there is nothing in the search engines to indicate it is any more notable than it was six years ago, and less than ten edits to improve it since the last discussion. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Primefac ( talk) 11:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Delete coverage I see is limited to event listings and one about its move, nothing to meet WP:ORG. Any Arabic speakers willing to chime in to see if there's adequate non-English sourcing? And concur, that last one should have been treated as a PROD. Star Mississippi 12:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Delete per Star Mississippi and nom. 4meter4 ( talk) 00:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 04:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - this is promotional piece rather than an encyclopedia article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.