The result was delete. Consensus is to delete as per arguments provided ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Not notable.
Claims to notability appear to be: (1) as a entertainment lawyer, her firm has had notable clients, (2) she's published papers, (3) she's appeared on television, (4) she owns a notable house, (this is mentioned in the refs although not the body of entry).
None of this puts her over the bar of notability. (1) is a standard "notability isn't inherited" case. (2) doesn't suggest anything more than an ordinary lawyer, nor does (3) really, the "Dr. Oz" appearance is not related to her work as a lawyer, this appearance appears to be as an unidentified audience member. And (4) doesn't cut it either. Different sub-notable claims to notability do not add up to one notable one. Prod declined. Hairhorn ( talk) 16:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
BenKovitz Thanks for the helpful suggestions, I appreciate it very much and will keep that in mind for future contributions. Ms. Selit works tirelessly on causes I hold dear and individuals that society has forgotten. I am familiar with her work and outstanding pro-bono commitment and believed a Wikipedia article was a good way to document her dedication and achievements. Since the consensus appears to be that a standalone article is not warranted, do you have any suggestions for how this article could be merged? Thanks again for your help. Lmatt123 ( talk) 23 May 2012 (UTC)
This is not a forum for personal attacks. NJ Wine ( talk) 03:28, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Comment - Ben Kovitz Been very tied up with work and had no time this week but, based on your suggestion above, I intend to do some research on WestLaw this weekend to look for cases where Ms. Selit played a particularly significant role. I am not very familiar with Google news archive, but when I insert Maryse Selit, Esq. into Google search, it brings up 221,000 hits. I intend to review those as well and edit the article based on my research this weekend. Lmatt123 ( talk) 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete as per arguments provided ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Not notable.
Claims to notability appear to be: (1) as a entertainment lawyer, her firm has had notable clients, (2) she's published papers, (3) she's appeared on television, (4) she owns a notable house, (this is mentioned in the refs although not the body of entry).
None of this puts her over the bar of notability. (1) is a standard "notability isn't inherited" case. (2) doesn't suggest anything more than an ordinary lawyer, nor does (3) really, the "Dr. Oz" appearance is not related to her work as a lawyer, this appearance appears to be as an unidentified audience member. And (4) doesn't cut it either. Different sub-notable claims to notability do not add up to one notable one. Prod declined. Hairhorn ( talk) 16:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply
BenKovitz Thanks for the helpful suggestions, I appreciate it very much and will keep that in mind for future contributions. Ms. Selit works tirelessly on causes I hold dear and individuals that society has forgotten. I am familiar with her work and outstanding pro-bono commitment and believed a Wikipedia article was a good way to document her dedication and achievements. Since the consensus appears to be that a standalone article is not warranted, do you have any suggestions for how this article could be merged? Thanks again for your help. Lmatt123 ( talk) 23 May 2012 (UTC)
This is not a forum for personal attacks. NJ Wine ( talk) 03:28, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Comment - Ben Kovitz Been very tied up with work and had no time this week but, based on your suggestion above, I intend to do some research on WestLaw this weekend to look for cases where Ms. Selit played a particularly significant role. I am not very familiar with Google news archive, but when I insert Maryse Selit, Esq. into Google search, it brings up 221,000 hits. I intend to review those as well and edit the article based on my research this weekend. Lmatt123 ( talk) 25 May 2012 (UTC)