The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 23:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Subject is a shortfilm actress with trivial coverage, limited to two/three urls. Deep significant secondary sources are lacking. Doesn't meet the first rule of WP:ENT. No notable roles in notable movies. Notability not established, fails GNG.
HM Wilburt (
talk) 23:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. My apologies,
HM Wilburt. I should not have removed the
prod. When I did so, I thought I had found some new
WP:RS... However, after
this edit, I learned it was not the case. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 00:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per nom and
MJL. I also tried to find some proper RS on GNG but could get nothing of substance. Certainly zero WP:SIGCOV, or other major article/book/section of book of which she is the main subject. Don't like situations where a WP BLP is effectively the main GNG on a subject (it should be the other way around). Simply WP:TOOSOON I'm afraid.
Britishfinance (
talk) 11:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 23:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Subject is a shortfilm actress with trivial coverage, limited to two/three urls. Deep significant secondary sources are lacking. Doesn't meet the first rule of WP:ENT. No notable roles in notable movies. Notability not established, fails GNG.
HM Wilburt (
talk) 23:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. My apologies,
HM Wilburt. I should not have removed the
prod. When I did so, I thought I had found some new
WP:RS... However, after
this edit, I learned it was not the case. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 00:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per nom and
MJL. I also tried to find some proper RS on GNG but could get nothing of substance. Certainly zero WP:SIGCOV, or other major article/book/section of book of which she is the main subject. Don't like situations where a WP BLP is effectively the main GNG on a subject (it should be the other way around). Simply WP:TOOSOON I'm afraid.
Britishfinance (
talk) 11:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.