The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No in-depth RS for her to pass
WP:GNG, created by a sock-farm. Most of the sources are primary and mostly passing mentions. If we start accepting similar bios, nearly all TV anchors will be on Wikipedia and there will be no significance of notability.
Akisharmadi (
talk)
10:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure what our normal approach is for articles created by socks and I don't want to put too much effort into saving this per
WP:BOGOF, but an honest nomination needs to include
WP:BEFORE, and this one seemingly did not.
[1], already present on the page, clearly qualifies for GNG. Beyond that, there's
[2], which is an interview but a reported, highly biographical one. I suspect if we search/review policy a little harder this will turn out to be a keep. {{u|Sdkb}}talk20:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No in-depth RS for her to pass
WP:GNG, created by a sock-farm. Most of the sources are primary and mostly passing mentions. If we start accepting similar bios, nearly all TV anchors will be on Wikipedia and there will be no significance of notability.
Akisharmadi (
talk)
10:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure what our normal approach is for articles created by socks and I don't want to put too much effort into saving this per
WP:BOGOF, but an honest nomination needs to include
WP:BEFORE, and this one seemingly did not.
[1], already present on the page, clearly qualifies for GNG. Beyond that, there's
[2], which is an interview but a reported, highly biographical one. I suspect if we search/review policy a little harder this will turn out to be a keep. {{u|Sdkb}}talk20:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.