The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 2003. redirect after deletion seems a valid search term. the keep arguments didn't advance policy based reasons to overlook the lack of sources. Spartaz Humbug! 16:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable. Being chosen Playmate of the Month or Playmate of the Year is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts solely related to their playmatehood are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability guideline. Damiens.rf 02:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 2003. redirect after deletion seems a valid search term. the keep arguments didn't advance policy based reasons to overlook the lack of sources. Spartaz Humbug! 16:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable. Being chosen Playmate of the Month or Playmate of the Year is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts solely related to their playmatehood are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability guideline. Damiens.rf 02:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC) reply