The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 01:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I'm not finding any proof that this film was ever released or any information about it having a name change then released.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I Looked and could only find this film title for a 1976 movie
Allaboutjane8181 (
talk) 17:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)reply
News here for
Steel1943 and Lemongirl942Allaboutjane8181: Actually the film was finally completed and released under yet another name, and a decent article under the released name already exists.
. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per this stub being an earlier wrong title on a now existing topic.. The earlier film name of Man Friday was dropped
[1][2] and the project became sourcable as G for Gold,
[3][4] BUT with that change Manju Warrior and Prithviraj Sukumaran were dropped from the cast and THAT title shelved in January 2014.
[5][6] The NEWS that my searches found was that it came off shelving and was finally created and released in 2015 under the name Loham (a decent article).
[7] The fact that it went though name changes might be mentioned in the article about the released film. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as still nothing convincing of notability for an article.
SwisterTwistertalk 04:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
LohamDelete per
User:MichaelQSchmidt. Just add a line to the existing article about the name and cast changes.
Meters (
talk) 20:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I was leaning toward redirect, until I looked at
this source and found it says that Man Friday was only "rumored" to be the title and was never actually reported or confirmed. Since this was never confirmed as the original title of Loham, it should be deleted. However someone should take
Schmidt's commendable research here and add it to the article Loham. --
MelanieN (
talk) 23:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Striking my Redirect and changing to Delete based on this.
Meters (
talk) 00:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 01:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I'm not finding any proof that this film was ever released or any information about it having a name change then released.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I Looked and could only find this film title for a 1976 movie
Allaboutjane8181 (
talk) 17:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)reply
News here for
Steel1943 and Lemongirl942Allaboutjane8181: Actually the film was finally completed and released under yet another name, and a decent article under the released name already exists.
. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per this stub being an earlier wrong title on a now existing topic.. The earlier film name of Man Friday was dropped
[1][2] and the project became sourcable as G for Gold,
[3][4] BUT with that change Manju Warrior and Prithviraj Sukumaran were dropped from the cast and THAT title shelved in January 2014.
[5][6] The NEWS that my searches found was that it came off shelving and was finally created and released in 2015 under the name Loham (a decent article).
[7] The fact that it went though name changes might be mentioned in the article about the released film. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as still nothing convincing of notability for an article.
SwisterTwistertalk 04:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
LohamDelete per
User:MichaelQSchmidt. Just add a line to the existing article about the name and cast changes.
Meters (
talk) 20:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete I was leaning toward redirect, until I looked at
this source and found it says that Man Friday was only "rumored" to be the title and was never actually reported or confirmed. Since this was never confirmed as the original title of Loham, it should be deleted. However someone should take
Schmidt's commendable research here and add it to the article Loham. --
MelanieN (
talk) 23:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Striking my Redirect and changing to Delete based on this.
Meters (
talk) 00:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.