The result was delete. Sandstein 10:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about a magazine which has no reliable sources nor can I find any further claims to notability. This fails WP:GNG and I cannot find anything to help support the lower guide of WP:NMEDIA McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 14:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete - I can't find a single secondary source to even verify that this magazine exists, much less that it's notable. This seems like a no-brainer. Article claims it's been around since 2004; if that's true, the utter absence of coverage by any sources seems to indicate it's never going to be notable. For all we know, the entire magazine is online only; there's no sources online that I found that could confirm any of the claims made in the article about the print edition, such as circulation of 50,000, the availability on east and west coasts, and even its very existence - that info could easily all be made up out of thin air. Rockypedia ( talk) 16:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about a magazine which has no reliable sources nor can I find any further claims to notability. This fails WP:GNG and I cannot find anything to help support the lower guide of WP:NMEDIA McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 14:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete - I can't find a single secondary source to even verify that this magazine exists, much less that it's notable. This seems like a no-brainer. Article claims it's been around since 2004; if that's true, the utter absence of coverage by any sources seems to indicate it's never going to be notable. For all we know, the entire magazine is online only; there's no sources online that I found that could confirm any of the claims made in the article about the print edition, such as circulation of 50,000, the availability on east and west coasts, and even its very existence - that info could easily all be made up out of thin air. Rockypedia ( talk) 16:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)