The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Another contested draftification without any improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, secondary, reliable source.
Onel5969TT me12:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. Of the above sources, one is a primary source from the Australian Professional Leagues Company and the other is from a fan blog that "anyone can contribute to" per their own site.
Alvaldi (
talk)
16:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: While numerically in the majority, the "keep" !votes fail to convince. It would be good if two sources could be found that are unequivocally reliable, independent, and in-depth. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk)
15:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete other than first-person or sources related to his club, there is no extensive coverage in third-party sources we can use. He might be notable, but we need sourcing about the person to keep the article. Please review what we consider RS.
Oaktree b (
talk)
19:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Seacactus 13 Being a top level pro player is curiously absent from the
GNG requirement of subjects having to have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Can you elaborate on how being a top level pro player without any significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject passes a guideline that requires exactly that?
Alvaldi (
talk)
21:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Player stats >> 1. "Player statistics for Luka Jovanovic - GameDay". My gameday. 7 October 2022.
Routine sports news >> 2. ^ "Reds promote promising duo to senior mens squad". Adelaide United. 5 July 2022.
Game news, nothing about subject >> 3. ^ "Western United FC vs Adelaide United FC". KEEPUP. 6 November 2022.
Awards show, played in list, nothing SIGCOV >> 4. ^ "Celebration of Football 2022 The Award Winners". Football SA. 10 October 2022.
Routine game news, intervew >> 5. ^ "DREAM-COME-TRUE FOR JOVANOVIĆ WITH MAIDEN GOAL". Adelaide United. 11 March 2023.
Routine sports news >> 6. ^ "Goodwin, Irankunda propel Adelaide past Jets in ALM". The West Australian. 11 March 2023.
Routine game news, interview >> 7. ^ "The Wanderers star mentoring an Adelaide young gun who's also eligible to represent a European giant". KEEPUP. 21 April 2023.
BEFORE showed stats and interviews, but nothing that meets IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.
WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (
WP:V and
WP:BLP) and guidelines (
WP:BIO and
WP:IS,
WP:RS,
WP:SIGCOV). //
Timothy ::
talk13:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Another contested draftification without any improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, secondary, reliable source.
Onel5969TT me12:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. Of the above sources, one is a primary source from the Australian Professional Leagues Company and the other is from a fan blog that "anyone can contribute to" per their own site.
Alvaldi (
talk)
16:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: While numerically in the majority, the "keep" !votes fail to convince. It would be good if two sources could be found that are unequivocally reliable, independent, and in-depth. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk)
15:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete other than first-person or sources related to his club, there is no extensive coverage in third-party sources we can use. He might be notable, but we need sourcing about the person to keep the article. Please review what we consider RS.
Oaktree b (
talk)
19:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Seacactus 13 Being a top level pro player is curiously absent from the
GNG requirement of subjects having to have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Can you elaborate on how being a top level pro player without any significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject passes a guideline that requires exactly that?
Alvaldi (
talk)
21:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Player stats >> 1. "Player statistics for Luka Jovanovic - GameDay". My gameday. 7 October 2022.
Routine sports news >> 2. ^ "Reds promote promising duo to senior mens squad". Adelaide United. 5 July 2022.
Game news, nothing about subject >> 3. ^ "Western United FC vs Adelaide United FC". KEEPUP. 6 November 2022.
Awards show, played in list, nothing SIGCOV >> 4. ^ "Celebration of Football 2022 The Award Winners". Football SA. 10 October 2022.
Routine game news, intervew >> 5. ^ "DREAM-COME-TRUE FOR JOVANOVIĆ WITH MAIDEN GOAL". Adelaide United. 11 March 2023.
Routine sports news >> 6. ^ "Goodwin, Irankunda propel Adelaide past Jets in ALM". The West Australian. 11 March 2023.
Routine game news, interview >> 7. ^ "The Wanderers star mentoring an Adelaide young gun who's also eligible to represent a European giant". KEEPUP. 21 April 2023.
BEFORE showed stats and interviews, but nothing that meets IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.
WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (
WP:V and
WP:BLP) and guidelines (
WP:BIO and
WP:IS,
WP:RS,
WP:SIGCOV). //
Timothy ::
talk13:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.