The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly referenced as having a strong claim to passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their films exist -- notability is
not inherited, so the notability test requires evidence of significance, supported by
WP:GNG-worthy reliable sourcing about them and their work.
But existence is the only notability claim being attempted here, the article is completely unsourced, and even the films listed in his filmography are almost all direct-to-video B-movies whose articles are also not properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for films either.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on his sourceability.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please assess the article in light of recent expansion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly referenced as having a strong claim to passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their films exist -- notability is
not inherited, so the notability test requires evidence of significance, supported by
WP:GNG-worthy reliable sourcing about them and their work.
But existence is the only notability claim being attempted here, the article is completely unsourced, and even the films listed in his filmography are almost all direct-to-video B-movies whose articles are also not properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for films either.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on his sourceability.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please assess the article in light of recent expansion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)