- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
List of types of websites
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of types of websites ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Weird meta-list that violates WP:NLIST and WP:OR. Almost completely unreferenced, there is no criteria regarding what kind of typology is used to describe the concept of type of a website. Some are red links (or would be if linked), like Affiliate agency, Membership website, Brand-building site, etc. Totally random and missing other types (ex. porn site). The latter is mentioned in the ORish inclusion-criteria lead as specifically not mentioned as it is a type of e-commerce website, but other e-commerce websites are listed, ex. Comparison shopping website. This is a mess that needs to be retired. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Websites, and Lists. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - we don't keep random stuff WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk) 09:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unsourced list. I mean, you can find sourced talking about websites, but this seems OR and would be too much of a hassle to source and rework. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Undoubtedly trivial article. Georgethedragonslayer ( talk) 15:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
List of types of websites
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of types of websites ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Weird meta-list that violates WP:NLIST and WP:OR. Almost completely unreferenced, there is no criteria regarding what kind of typology is used to describe the concept of type of a website. Some are red links (or would be if linked), like Affiliate agency, Membership website, Brand-building site, etc. Totally random and missing other types (ex. porn site). The latter is mentioned in the ORish inclusion-criteria lead as specifically not mentioned as it is a type of e-commerce website, but other e-commerce websites are listed, ex. Comparison shopping website. This is a mess that needs to be retired. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Websites, and Lists. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - we don't keep random stuff WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk) 09:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unsourced list. I mean, you can find sourced talking about websites, but this seems OR and would be too much of a hassle to source and rework. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Undoubtedly trivial article. Georgethedragonslayer ( talk) 15:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.