The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (
Talk) 21:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)reply
topic fails
WP:GNG due to severe lack of in depth coverage in independent and reliable sources All my warmest wishes,
ItsKesha (
talk) 20:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)reply
* Keep: Passes CLN and AOAL. Should only contain sourced and notable items. //
Timothy ::
talk 22:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC) reply
What are the sources for a list of footballers with 300 or more PL games? How does this pass "advantages of a list" exactly,
TimothyBlue? All my warmest wishes,
ItsKesha (
talk) 15:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Patagonia41 - don't know if it changes your view, but note that this article is a list of footballers with 300 or more Premier League appearances for one club, not 300 in total (the other list is for players who have played 500 in total, some of whom played for as many as five different clubs)..... --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 16:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete we have a notable article for 500+ appearances, no reason why we'd need another article for a 300+ appearances.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 16:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Joseph2302 - don't know if it changes your view, but note that this article is a list of footballers with 300 or more Premier League appearances for one club, not 300 in total --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 16:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
There's still sufficient overlap that we don't need both lists. And this one doesn't show why it passes
WP:NLIST, or why 300 is a notable number.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 08:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Dup fork per above therefore fails CLN and AOAL. No sources show it passing NLIST. //
Timothy ::
talk 16:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (
Talk) 21:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)reply
topic fails
WP:GNG due to severe lack of in depth coverage in independent and reliable sources All my warmest wishes,
ItsKesha (
talk) 20:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)reply
* Keep: Passes CLN and AOAL. Should only contain sourced and notable items. //
Timothy ::
talk 22:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC) reply
What are the sources for a list of footballers with 300 or more PL games? How does this pass "advantages of a list" exactly,
TimothyBlue? All my warmest wishes,
ItsKesha (
talk) 15:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Patagonia41 - don't know if it changes your view, but note that this article is a list of footballers with 300 or more Premier League appearances for one club, not 300 in total (the other list is for players who have played 500 in total, some of whom played for as many as five different clubs)..... --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 16:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete we have a notable article for 500+ appearances, no reason why we'd need another article for a 300+ appearances.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 16:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Joseph2302 - don't know if it changes your view, but note that this article is a list of footballers with 300 or more Premier League appearances for one club, not 300 in total --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 16:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
There's still sufficient overlap that we don't need both lists. And this one doesn't show why it passes
WP:NLIST, or why 300 is a notable number.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 08:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Dup fork per above therefore fails CLN and AOAL. No sources show it passing NLIST. //
Timothy ::
talk 16:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.