The result was keep. At this point, after 2 weeks, there seems to be consensus the article is improvable & that improvement has already begun DGG ( talk) 00:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
This looks like a lot of work went into this, so I would say to come up with this falls under both WP:IINFO and WP:OR. It's just a list of artists charting on miscellaneous Billboard charts. Wolfer68 ( talk) 23:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Let's not remove the entire article. It's not some random or indiscriminate listing of artists' charting hits. I don't see it any more trivial than information presented in these other listings:
We can trim the 300+ artist list to 200 or so and make it more manageable.-- Don1962 ( talk) 00:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply
I think the article just needs better organization. It's obvious time was spent and is very resourceful for modern music. The other list shows artist with many who stop making music. This list shows artist who are currently recording and are the most successful modern artist. I don't think it should be deleted at all; just better organized. Forever Kenny ( talk)
I've started adding references and cleaned up columns.-- Don1962 ( talk) 16:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep. I can see how this information isn't found in one place online, as serves as a listing of chart achievements. I note how Michael Jackson is called "the King of Pop." Yet, his sister has had more charting hits. And in terms of number of hits (not sales, which is dealt with in numerous other Wiki pages) MJ is nowhere near the top of the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.149.3.181 ( talk) 18:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. At this point, after 2 weeks, there seems to be consensus the article is improvable & that improvement has already begun DGG ( talk) 00:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
This looks like a lot of work went into this, so I would say to come up with this falls under both WP:IINFO and WP:OR. It's just a list of artists charting on miscellaneous Billboard charts. Wolfer68 ( talk) 23:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Let's not remove the entire article. It's not some random or indiscriminate listing of artists' charting hits. I don't see it any more trivial than information presented in these other listings:
We can trim the 300+ artist list to 200 or so and make it more manageable.-- Don1962 ( talk) 00:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply
I think the article just needs better organization. It's obvious time was spent and is very resourceful for modern music. The other list shows artist with many who stop making music. This list shows artist who are currently recording and are the most successful modern artist. I don't think it should be deleted at all; just better organized. Forever Kenny ( talk)
I've started adding references and cleaned up columns.-- Don1962 ( talk) 16:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep. I can see how this information isn't found in one place online, as serves as a listing of chart achievements. I note how Michael Jackson is called "the King of Pop." Yet, his sister has had more charting hits. And in terms of number of hits (not sales, which is dealt with in numerous other Wiki pages) MJ is nowhere near the top of the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.149.3.181 ( talk) 18:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply