From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC) reply

List of artists with the most number ones on the Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is merely a page that may be great for chart fans but this list just covers info for a secondary chart that has little written about it outside Billboard itself, the primary source. The entire basis of this article is succinctly covered at Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 17:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - This goes into far more detail about the record and statistics than the page you link to. This is no different to many other lists like this.  —  Calvin999 12:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Unsure leaning slightly towards delete If you ignore the prose you end up with an unnecessary content fork. Also when you have paragraphs of statistics and song names longer than the actual list then it is hard to justify calling it a list. I see the name was changed a couple of years ago to call it a list which I think is wrong and should be changed back if the article stays in it's current state. Still it all seems a bit WP:IINFO & WP:FANCRUFTY particularly when this is just a minor chart and therefore lacks secondary sources to make it a notable topic/list. Mattg82 ( talk) 01:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles – I definitely think this isn't necessary. It is sufficiently covered at Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles, and the information in prose can be found at the artists' respective discography articles. I agree that this falls under WP:IINFO, as these are statistics that don't have that much attention in reliable sources, and aren't even for the flagship Billboard chart (the Hot 100). As the nominator pointed out, a similar article for the Hot 100 was redirected. Mz7 ( talk) 22:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles; merge individual achievements prose that isn't already there to the performers' articles - clean and easy - most of the table info, the most important info, is already there. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 00:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC) reply

List of artists with the most number ones on the Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is merely a page that may be great for chart fans but this list just covers info for a secondary chart that has little written about it outside Billboard itself, the primary source. The entire basis of this article is succinctly covered at Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 17:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - This goes into far more detail about the record and statistics than the page you link to. This is no different to many other lists like this.  —  Calvin999 12:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Unsure leaning slightly towards delete If you ignore the prose you end up with an unnecessary content fork. Also when you have paragraphs of statistics and song names longer than the actual list then it is hard to justify calling it a list. I see the name was changed a couple of years ago to call it a list which I think is wrong and should be changed back if the article stays in it's current state. Still it all seems a bit WP:IINFO & WP:FANCRUFTY particularly when this is just a minor chart and therefore lacks secondary sources to make it a notable topic/list. Mattg82 ( talk) 01:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles – I definitely think this isn't necessary. It is sufficiently covered at Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles, and the information in prose can be found at the artists' respective discography articles. I agree that this falls under WP:IINFO, as these are statistics that don't have that much attention in reliable sources, and aren't even for the flagship Billboard chart (the Hot 100). As the nominator pointed out, a similar article for the Hot 100 was redirected. Mz7 ( talk) 22:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Mainstream Top 40#Artists with the most number-one singles; merge individual achievements prose that isn't already there to the performers' articles - clean and easy - most of the table info, the most important info, is already there. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 00:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook