The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't find any reason that this woman is notable for anything in tennis. She is not notable per
Tennis Project Guidelines or
WP:NSPORT Guidelines. I checked the WTA website... no playing at all on the WTA tour. No minor league victory in an 50,000+ ITF event. No Fed Cup, no jrs championship. All she has done in singles or doubles is play the lowest level of minor league (the minor minor league) and only won a few of them. Perhaps she makes GNG notabiity in some manner I can't see, but she has done nothing notable in tennis.
Fyunck(click) (
talk) 19:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Looking over the athlete's records, it would appear she does not meet
WP:NTENNIS, as she hasn't met any of those standards in playing in a GS event, or a major international competition, or winning a significant event.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 19:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Cursory Google search yields several references to reinforce
WP:GNG, including (but not limited to):
12,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7. Article is also on Germany, Italian, Polish and Arabic wikis. Article needs expansion, not deletion per
WP:ATD.
Hmlarson (
talk) 19:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Whether or not she meets GNG with local newspapers is up for debate. She is not notable for anything tennis-related by playing in minor-minor-league tennis. But what other wiki's standards are has no bearing on this English Wikipedia.
Fyunck(click) (
talk) 21:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as considering where this AfD is going regarding attention, it's enough for me to suggest keeping, certainly not a delete needed article. Delete and Draft for now as this is still questionable then for better notability improvements.SwisterTwistertalk 05:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)reply
It's unclear if this !vote is based only upon sources in the article, or if it included additional source searches, such as those available using the Find sources template atop, among others. North America1000 12:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 17:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – Seems to have enough basis for notability. There are enough references available to back up this point. NikolaiHo 21:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't find any reason that this woman is notable for anything in tennis. She is not notable per
Tennis Project Guidelines or
WP:NSPORT Guidelines. I checked the WTA website... no playing at all on the WTA tour. No minor league victory in an 50,000+ ITF event. No Fed Cup, no jrs championship. All she has done in singles or doubles is play the lowest level of minor league (the minor minor league) and only won a few of them. Perhaps she makes GNG notabiity in some manner I can't see, but she has done nothing notable in tennis.
Fyunck(click) (
talk) 19:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Looking over the athlete's records, it would appear she does not meet
WP:NTENNIS, as she hasn't met any of those standards in playing in a GS event, or a major international competition, or winning a significant event.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 19:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Cursory Google search yields several references to reinforce
WP:GNG, including (but not limited to):
12,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7. Article is also on Germany, Italian, Polish and Arabic wikis. Article needs expansion, not deletion per
WP:ATD.
Hmlarson (
talk) 19:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Whether or not she meets GNG with local newspapers is up for debate. She is not notable for anything tennis-related by playing in minor-minor-league tennis. But what other wiki's standards are has no bearing on this English Wikipedia.
Fyunck(click) (
talk) 21:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as considering where this AfD is going regarding attention, it's enough for me to suggest keeping, certainly not a delete needed article. Delete and Draft for now as this is still questionable then for better notability improvements.SwisterTwistertalk 05:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)reply
It's unclear if this !vote is based only upon sources in the article, or if it included additional source searches, such as those available using the Find sources template atop, among others. North America1000 12:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 17:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – Seems to have enough basis for notability. There are enough references available to back up this point. NikolaiHo 21:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.