The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This character article was created just recently, but uses extremely lackluster sourcing with no evidence of significant coverage at all. Fails
WP:GNG, I would heavily recommend the article creator take a look at the details of what
WP:SIGCOV entails.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
04:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
@
GlatorNator: She wasn't created nearly as recently, but I agree. IGN seems to be the only publication with SIGCOV about her. She hasn't been notable since 2014 when the article was unmerged.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
19:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
@
GlatorNator:@
Zxcvbnm: I went ahead and merged Helena. I couldn't find much sources as a cursory glance, and even the citations referring to polls noted her as a much lower character when it came to popularity. If it gets unmerged and someone tries to fight it with no proper sourcing, then yeah I agree on AfD.--
Kung Fu Man (
talk)
02:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This character article was created just recently, but uses extremely lackluster sourcing with no evidence of significant coverage at all. Fails
WP:GNG, I would heavily recommend the article creator take a look at the details of what
WP:SIGCOV entails.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
04:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
@
GlatorNator: She wasn't created nearly as recently, but I agree. IGN seems to be the only publication with SIGCOV about her. She hasn't been notable since 2014 when the article was unmerged.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
19:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)reply
@
GlatorNator:@
Zxcvbnm: I went ahead and merged Helena. I couldn't find much sources as a cursory glance, and even the citations referring to polls noted her as a much lower character when it came to popularity. If it gets unmerged and someone tries to fight it with no proper sourcing, then yeah I agree on AfD.--
Kung Fu Man (
talk)
02:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.