- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Lanny Silva
- Lanny Silva ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested Prod with no reason given. Initial concern remains valid: player fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Discussion here failed to achieve consensus that the league was fully professional. With only a small handful of games played and no indication of international appearances at any level, it is doubtful that the player could satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 13:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down ( talk) 13:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 13:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 13:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 16:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Question - Didn't you remove Liga MX Femenil (the league she plays in) from WP:FPL Fenix down? ( ref) and then come to my user talk page with this? and this a day later?
- Actually, you have quite a
history of removing women's leagues from any section of the essay which you are citing here - why is that?
Hmlarson (
talk) 06:27, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, because you had not bothered trying to achieve consensus. The discussion which I started after doing so is clearly linked in the deletion rationale highlighting that consensus has not yet been achieved. Please keep discussion in this page specifically to the notability of this player. Fenix down ( talk) 08:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Jaramillo Hmlarson ( talk) 08:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- '
Delete'Fail WP:NFOOTBALL. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 13:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Withdrew my vote I am afraid I am not very familar with AfD. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 07:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC) - Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. With reference to the specific sources in the article:
- ligafemenil.mx - Primary source, not suitable for GNG
- fmfstateofmind.com - match day summary, routine coverage, with only a brief mention of the player. No significant coverage.
- mediotiempo.com - article focusing on the team, not the player, briefly mentioned in one sentence, no significant coverage. Fenix down ( talk) 15:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Question 1
Hhhhhkohhhhh - Can you tell us if you have a previous user name or account?
Hmlarson (
talk) 01:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- @ Hmlarson: No! This is my first account. Before I created this account, I used IP to edit. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 07:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can you please try to work on the basis that this is a good faith nomination and focus on discussing the notability of this player here. If you have issues with a particular editor you are well aware that there are other more appropriate forums for these to be aired. Fenix down ( talk) 07:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:GNG and not accepted as a fully pro league due to low level salaries Atlantic306 ( talk) 16:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. Bythebooklibrary ( talk) 19:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG, non-notable athlete.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 20:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Lanny Silva
- Lanny Silva ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested Prod with no reason given. Initial concern remains valid: player fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Discussion here failed to achieve consensus that the league was fully professional. With only a small handful of games played and no indication of international appearances at any level, it is doubtful that the player could satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 13:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down ( talk) 13:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 13:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 13:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 16:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Question - Didn't you remove Liga MX Femenil (the league she plays in) from WP:FPL Fenix down? ( ref) and then come to my user talk page with this? and this a day later?
- Actually, you have quite a
history of removing women's leagues from any section of the essay which you are citing here - why is that?
Hmlarson (
talk) 06:27, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, because you had not bothered trying to achieve consensus. The discussion which I started after doing so is clearly linked in the deletion rationale highlighting that consensus has not yet been achieved. Please keep discussion in this page specifically to the notability of this player. Fenix down ( talk) 08:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Jaramillo Hmlarson ( talk) 08:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- '
Delete'Fail WP:NFOOTBALL. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 13:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Withdrew my vote I am afraid I am not very familar with AfD. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 07:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC) - Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. With reference to the specific sources in the article:
- ligafemenil.mx - Primary source, not suitable for GNG
- fmfstateofmind.com - match day summary, routine coverage, with only a brief mention of the player. No significant coverage.
- mediotiempo.com - article focusing on the team, not the player, briefly mentioned in one sentence, no significant coverage. Fenix down ( talk) 15:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Question 1
Hhhhhkohhhhh - Can you tell us if you have a previous user name or account?
Hmlarson (
talk) 01:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- @ Hmlarson: No! This is my first account. Before I created this account, I used IP to edit. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 07:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can you please try to work on the basis that this is a good faith nomination and focus on discussing the notability of this player here. If you have issues with a particular editor you are well aware that there are other more appropriate forums for these to be aired. Fenix down ( talk) 07:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:GNG and not accepted as a fully pro league due to low level salaries Atlantic306 ( talk) 16:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. Bythebooklibrary ( talk) 19:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG, non-notable athlete.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 20:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.