- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Lady Bardales
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lady Bardales ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominating on behalf of Kaltariel ( talk · contribs) who prodded the article; as it was previously AFD'd in 2020, it's not eligible for prod. Previous AFD closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Police and Law. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I nominated it because the topic didn't seem to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia. There doesn't seem to be wide enough interest in the topic. Kaltariel ( talk) 18:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I still stand by my view stated in the 2020 nomination that the sources are too tabloidish. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- This is the third nomination..we need to establish a limit on nominations because otherwise, in 20 years we will still be debating whether an article merits being deleted or not. I think two or perhaps three nominations would be enough and then if it's not deleted after that, snowball. As it is I will again vote weak keep. The subject was involved in a big scandal, the Monica Lewinski of Peru if you will. And we are not nominating Monica for deletion. Antonio El Donado Martin ( aca) 19:56, May 17, 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep this and this establish notability. NemesisAT ( talk) 15:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The above sources are WP:SIGCOV, there are a few more in English at Newspapers.com, and she is certainly not any less notable than she was in 2020: notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY. Jacona ( talk) 21:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Lady Bardales
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lady Bardales ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominating on behalf of Kaltariel ( talk · contribs) who prodded the article; as it was previously AFD'd in 2020, it's not eligible for prod. Previous AFD closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Police and Law. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I nominated it because the topic didn't seem to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia. There doesn't seem to be wide enough interest in the topic. Kaltariel ( talk) 18:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I still stand by my view stated in the 2020 nomination that the sources are too tabloidish. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- This is the third nomination..we need to establish a limit on nominations because otherwise, in 20 years we will still be debating whether an article merits being deleted or not. I think two or perhaps three nominations would be enough and then if it's not deleted after that, snowball. As it is I will again vote weak keep. The subject was involved in a big scandal, the Monica Lewinski of Peru if you will. And we are not nominating Monica for deletion. Antonio El Donado Martin ( aca) 19:56, May 17, 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep this and this establish notability. NemesisAT ( talk) 15:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The above sources are WP:SIGCOV, there are a few more in English at Newspapers.com, and she is certainly not any less notable than she was in 2020: notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY. Jacona ( talk) 21:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.