- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kwisp ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This band fails to meet any of the notability guidelines in WP:BAND. The only source cited is about another band, Fifty Foot Hose, and does not mention Kwisp at all. Could not successfully find any good sources. Mkcaldwell ( talk) 04:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mkcaldwell ( talk) 04:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mkcaldwell ( talk) 04:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment if deleted, I think this should retarget to CERN_Axion_Solar_Telescope#KWISP_Detector as a plausible target for our readers -- Lenticel ( talk) 09:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Notability in question. It seems that Kwisp entries in google is more about kinetic WISP (quantum mechanics) (KWISP) rather than the band. -- Lenticel ( talk) 09:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kwisp ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This band fails to meet any of the notability guidelines in WP:BAND. The only source cited is about another band, Fifty Foot Hose, and does not mention Kwisp at all. Could not successfully find any good sources. Mkcaldwell ( talk) 04:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mkcaldwell ( talk) 04:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mkcaldwell ( talk) 04:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment if deleted, I think this should retarget to CERN_Axion_Solar_Telescope#KWISP_Detector as a plausible target for our readers -- Lenticel ( talk) 09:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Notability in question. It seems that Kwisp entries in google is more about kinetic WISP (quantum mechanics) (KWISP) rather than the band. -- Lenticel ( talk) 09:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.