- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Kislay Pandey
- Kislay Pandey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
For being a "prominent" lawyer, I can't find any coverage other than "said Mr. Pandey" or "represented by Pandey". Thus, it would seem he fails GNG. Primefac ( talk) 19:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Pandey is just one of thousands if not tens of thousands of lawyers in India. Nothing to distinguish him from the others. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:SPAM. Reference WP:BOMBARDMENT to hide the lack of notability. Subject doesn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. Anup [Talk] 20:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing showing notability at all. Wikipedia is not Martindale-Hubbell. Kierzek ( talk) 23:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Kislay Pandey
- Kislay Pandey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
For being a "prominent" lawyer, I can't find any coverage other than "said Mr. Pandey" or "represented by Pandey". Thus, it would seem he fails GNG. Primefac ( talk) 19:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Pandey is just one of thousands if not tens of thousands of lawyers in India. Nothing to distinguish him from the others. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:SPAM. Reference WP:BOMBARDMENT to hide the lack of notability. Subject doesn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. Anup [Talk] 20:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing showing notability at all. Wikipedia is not Martindale-Hubbell. Kierzek ( talk) 23:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.