The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment In regards to both keep !votes:
WP:FPL is not a guideline or policy on Wikipedia. It can not be used to validate or discredit a subject's inclusion.
WP:NFOOTBALL is an SNG that can be used to presume notability for article creation. However, the article must still face the same scrutiny as all other articles to maintain inclusion when brought be fore an AfD. NFOOTBALL can not be the sole deciding factor in this case. Does the subject meet the basic requirements by our notability guideline found under
WP:N. Does the subject receive "significant coverage in reliable and independent sources"? If the answer is yes then the article must be kept. If the answer is no then the presumed notability by the SNG (NFOOTBALL) is rebutted and the article should be removed not matter how many professional games they have played in or what league they belong in. GiantSnowman is correct that a
WP:BEFORE search is expected of anyone who nominates and !votes on an AFD. --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
17:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Conducted a
WP:BEFORE search and can only find player profiles and game stats. This may add to notability, once established, but does not constitute "significant coverage in reliabel and independent sources" therefore the subject fails notability as per
WP:N. --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
18:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - does clearly meet
WP:NFOOTBALL with 34 appearances in J3. Page could do with expanding, but there isn't always substantial info to be added with pages such as these - of which there are thousands.
Here is a little interview, though the source isn't one I'm familiar with, and
here is another article about him. Though there isn't much to write about to expand the article, I will add a little detail now.
Davidlofgren1996 (
talk)
21:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Neither is considered a reliable secondary source. Interviews are considered primary. None confer notability based on Wikipedia's notability guideline. --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
21:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Well, don't let me catch any of you commenting on other articles citing the criteria of
WP:GNG or
WP:N as a reason for deletion then.
WP:NOT Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. ;-) --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
21:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - strong consensus that a strong NFOOTBALL pass is enough for the article to be kept; I see no reason for this one to go against consensus
Spiderone12:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment In regards to both keep !votes:
WP:FPL is not a guideline or policy on Wikipedia. It can not be used to validate or discredit a subject's inclusion.
WP:NFOOTBALL is an SNG that can be used to presume notability for article creation. However, the article must still face the same scrutiny as all other articles to maintain inclusion when brought be fore an AfD. NFOOTBALL can not be the sole deciding factor in this case. Does the subject meet the basic requirements by our notability guideline found under
WP:N. Does the subject receive "significant coverage in reliable and independent sources"? If the answer is yes then the article must be kept. If the answer is no then the presumed notability by the SNG (NFOOTBALL) is rebutted and the article should be removed not matter how many professional games they have played in or what league they belong in. GiantSnowman is correct that a
WP:BEFORE search is expected of anyone who nominates and !votes on an AFD. --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
17:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Conducted a
WP:BEFORE search and can only find player profiles and game stats. This may add to notability, once established, but does not constitute "significant coverage in reliabel and independent sources" therefore the subject fails notability as per
WP:N. --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
18:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - does clearly meet
WP:NFOOTBALL with 34 appearances in J3. Page could do with expanding, but there isn't always substantial info to be added with pages such as these - of which there are thousands.
Here is a little interview, though the source isn't one I'm familiar with, and
here is another article about him. Though there isn't much to write about to expand the article, I will add a little detail now.
Davidlofgren1996 (
talk)
21:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Neither is considered a reliable secondary source. Interviews are considered primary. None confer notability based on Wikipedia's notability guideline. --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
21:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Well, don't let me catch any of you commenting on other articles citing the criteria of
WP:GNG or
WP:N as a reason for deletion then.
WP:NOT Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. ;-) --
ARoseWolf (
Talk)
21:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - strong consensus that a strong NFOOTBALL pass is enough for the article to be kept; I see no reason for this one to go against consensus
Spiderone12:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.