- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kępniak, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Likely fails WP:NGEO. More details at pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2024:04:07:Kępniak (osada) but TL;DR - former settlement that nothing is known about except that it existed c. 1921, we don't even know exactly where (somewhere in a particular county, probably). No evidence that it was ever permanently inhabited, it could have been a single house or business or who knows what. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Pinging editors interested in this in past similar discussions: User:FOARP, User:Ilawa-Kataka. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Another example of why just having been an Osada or similar at some point doesn't mean anything, since these can be individual buildings that may never have been inhabited, including foresters lodges, farms, railway stations, etc. In this case the only source given in the article is TERYT but I don't find anything on TERYT corresponding to this under the SIMC number given on PL Wiki (1036879). Possibly there is other information out there about this place but nothing that indicates notability. FOARP ( talk) 19:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kępniak, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Likely fails WP:NGEO. More details at pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2024:04:07:Kępniak (osada) but TL;DR - former settlement that nothing is known about except that it existed c. 1921, we don't even know exactly where (somewhere in a particular county, probably). No evidence that it was ever permanently inhabited, it could have been a single house or business or who knows what. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Pinging editors interested in this in past similar discussions: User:FOARP, User:Ilawa-Kataka. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Another example of why just having been an Osada or similar at some point doesn't mean anything, since these can be individual buildings that may never have been inhabited, including foresters lodges, farms, railway stations, etc. In this case the only source given in the article is TERYT but I don't find anything on TERYT corresponding to this under the SIMC number given on PL Wiki (1036879). Possibly there is other information out there about this place but nothing that indicates notability. FOARP ( talk) 19:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.