The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on a version of this article in Draft space, let me know or make a request at WP:REFUND. TOOSOON implies that there might be a time when better sources exist and a new article can pass AFC review and be put back into main space. Liz Read! Talk! 00:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Bio of a composer/academic fails GNG, NBIO, NACADEMIC, NMUSIC. The independent sources do not show WP:SIGCOV; WP:BEFORE search turns up no other reliable, independent, secondary sources with significant coverage or evidence of notability under any of the other SNG guidelines that might apply. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 23:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
03:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Discussion currently leans toward deletion, but a clearer consensus would be appreciated given that there has been an objection to deletion and thus soft-deletion seems inappropriate. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on a version of this article in Draft space, let me know or make a request at WP:REFUND. TOOSOON implies that there might be a time when better sources exist and a new article can pass AFC review and be put back into main space. Liz Read! Talk! 00:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Bio of a composer/academic fails GNG, NBIO, NACADEMIC, NMUSIC. The independent sources do not show WP:SIGCOV; WP:BEFORE search turns up no other reliable, independent, secondary sources with significant coverage or evidence of notability under any of the other SNG guidelines that might apply. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 23:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
03:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Discussion currently leans toward deletion, but a clearer consensus would be appreciated given that there has been an objection to deletion and thus soft-deletion seems inappropriate. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)