The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
BLP that has been unsourced for four and a half years. She has the post of Pro-Vice-Chancellor for International Strategy at the University of Cambridge (
[1]) but she doesn't seem notable as an academic and I didn't find much in the way of significant independent coverage. I was unable to confirm an original source (several sites appear to be sourced from this article) but this article does look like it was copied from another website.
Michig (
talk)
19:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment I am unsure. Pro-Vice-Chancellor does not seem to be "a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society". As the college is part of Cambridge University, that doesn't seem to qualify either. Neither am I certain that being a Fellow of the RSA constitutes "a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level", given that our article on the RSA states that there are currently 27,000 such Fellows. --
Randykitty (
talk)
13:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep -- Cambridge University Colleges are not merely halls of residence, and pro-vice-chancellor is a deputy head of the university (under the Vice-Chancellor), the Chancellor being an honorary post. In some cases (such as
Downing College, Cambridge, we have a list of masters in the article on the college. That seems to be missing in this case, possibly because it is a women's college (and hence younger) but that should not make a difference.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
22:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep We need to look at a person's notability in the round. As pointed out, these posts are highly prestigious, more so than being a vice-chancellor at most UK universities. --
AJHingston (
talk)
18:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
BLP that has been unsourced for four and a half years. She has the post of Pro-Vice-Chancellor for International Strategy at the University of Cambridge (
[1]) but she doesn't seem notable as an academic and I didn't find much in the way of significant independent coverage. I was unable to confirm an original source (several sites appear to be sourced from this article) but this article does look like it was copied from another website.
Michig (
talk)
19:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment I am unsure. Pro-Vice-Chancellor does not seem to be "a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society". As the college is part of Cambridge University, that doesn't seem to qualify either. Neither am I certain that being a Fellow of the RSA constitutes "a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level", given that our article on the RSA states that there are currently 27,000 such Fellows. --
Randykitty (
talk)
13:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep -- Cambridge University Colleges are not merely halls of residence, and pro-vice-chancellor is a deputy head of the university (under the Vice-Chancellor), the Chancellor being an honorary post. In some cases (such as
Downing College, Cambridge, we have a list of masters in the article on the college. That seems to be missing in this case, possibly because it is a women's college (and hence younger) but that should not make a difference.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
22:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep We need to look at a person's notability in the round. As pointed out, these posts are highly prestigious, more so than being a vice-chancellor at most UK universities. --
AJHingston (
talk)
18:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.