- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 07:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Jean Lee (reporter) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been tagged for all kinds of problems, for seven years now. If it had been created after 2010 it would no doubt have been deleted as an unsourced BLP. Person does not have an automatically notable position, and I don't see coverage about her to make her pass the GNG--though it is true that Google delivers plenty of hits that mention her (even among all the false positives). But we need secondary sourcing here. Drmies ( talk) 17:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm all for the deletion. Non-notable and relying on primary sources. Interlaker ( talk) 00:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - not even one reliable source. Bearian ( talk) 04:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 10:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 10:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Could not establish notability. Could not deorphan. ~ Kvng ( talk) 18:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete We need to be vigilant to make sure articles on living people actually meet notability guidelines, and this comes no where close. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- @ Johnpacklambert: You may wish to join us at WP:ORPHAN (e.g. Category:Orphaned_articles_from_February_2009) and/or WP:PJAA (e.g. WP:DUSTY) where you'll find lots of chaff like this. I typically either tag with {{ notability}} or use WP:PROD to keep from bogging down AfD with this stuff. ~ Kvng ( talk) 20:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 07:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Jean Lee (reporter) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been tagged for all kinds of problems, for seven years now. If it had been created after 2010 it would no doubt have been deleted as an unsourced BLP. Person does not have an automatically notable position, and I don't see coverage about her to make her pass the GNG--though it is true that Google delivers plenty of hits that mention her (even among all the false positives). But we need secondary sourcing here. Drmies ( talk) 17:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm all for the deletion. Non-notable and relying on primary sources. Interlaker ( talk) 00:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - not even one reliable source. Bearian ( talk) 04:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 10:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 10:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Could not establish notability. Could not deorphan. ~ Kvng ( talk) 18:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete We need to be vigilant to make sure articles on living people actually meet notability guidelines, and this comes no where close. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- @ Johnpacklambert: You may wish to join us at WP:ORPHAN (e.g. Category:Orphaned_articles_from_February_2009) and/or WP:PJAA (e.g. WP:DUSTY) where you'll find lots of chaff like this. I typically either tag with {{ notability}} or use WP:PROD to keep from bogging down AfD with this stuff. ~ Kvng ( talk) 20:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.